This article explains the differences between two AI meeting-recording tools—from live transcription and translation to AI summaries—covering pros and cons end to end.

Meeting Ink vs Notta (2025) full comparison: want to boost meeting efficiency? We'll help you choose the solution that fits you best.

Feature comparison｜How to choose an AI meeting recorder?

Meeting Ink easily supports both online and in-person meetings, and can even process audio and video directly from links. It offers multi-speaker identification, AI meeting summaries, translation in 20+ languages, and live captions. With a rich feature set for every meeting scenario—whether on Zoom, Google Meet, or Teams—Meeting Ink delivers the most complete service. See features

Notta also provides transcription, translation, and summarization—quickly turning meetings or recordings into verbatim texts and summaries. It offers a solid experience, especially for individual users.

Features

Supported platforms

Performance test: Which tool records meetings faster? One test will tell.

Using the same standard MP3 audio file (audio in English), duration: 26 minutes:

• The test audio is a real-world English podcast recording with multiple speakers, closely mirroring actual meeting scenarios.
• Test setup: MacBook Air M4 / Chrome browser / stable Wi-Fi.

Test results:

In the preprocessing stage, Meeting Ink took 2 min 53 s in total—faster than Notta's 6 min 45 s.
For summary generation, Meeting Ink also needed only about half of Notta's time.

User takeaways｜Which plan fits you?

Meeting Ink supports Traditional Chinese transcript translation, while Notta currently supports Simplified Chinese only. For users in Taiwan, Meeting Ink aligns better with daily use—no need to convert Simplified to Traditional with extra tools.

When testing the same audio file, Meeting Ink delivered better speed, noticeably improving meeting efficiency. Both tools let you customize summaries; Notta additionally offers a mind-map feature, which can help with thinking and understanding.

On pricing, Meeting Ink has a free plan with 3 hours per month and up to 30 minutes per recording. Notta's free plan offers 2 hours per month with 3 minutes per use. If you're on a tight budget, try Meeting Ink first.

If you're a student or office worker, consider Meeting Ink Pro: NT$279/month for 20 hours of meetings. Notta is US$8.17 (annual billing).

Click to view plans: https://ink.dwave.cc/en-US/pricing

Product takeaways & recommendations

Both Meeting Ink and Notta are widely discussed meeting-recording tools. Overall, Meeting Ink better serves Taiwanese and Chinese-speaking users with speed, Traditional Chinese support, and pricing options, streamlining the recording workflow. Notta has its strengths too—like the mind-map feature, great for users who prefer more visual thinking when organizing content. If you want all-around capability and an efficient workflow, Meeting Ink remains the more reliable AI meeting recorder.